MyFox
 

jackconaty's Blog

by jackconaty from chicago

Last Post 8 days, 20 hours Ago


This post has been edited by an administrator

The baby boom has long been notorious for it's need for "instant gratification." The media wants it as well, not just for marketing purposes but because it fuels the sense of "live'...the sense that it is, to paraphrase Mike Huckabee, "events and not process" that define our lives and infuse public affairs.

But "You Decide 2008" is not shaping up or working out in ways that will play to that sort of immediate analysis and limited attention span.  Take the Democrats for instance.  Former president Bill Clinton is slowly but surely taking center stage.  Some think it unseemly that a former president would so deliberately play the role of "attack dog" in his wife's campaign.  He's called the Obama candidacy "a role of the dice" and Obama's opposition to the war in Iraq "a fairy tale."  The video of the former president working the the floors of casinos in Las Vegas, putting the arm on union workers before their caucuses created images something less than diplomatic.  And this week he will raise his profile on the super sensitive subject of race in Atlanta on Martin Luther King's birthday and later in South Carolina where the African-American vote is so critical in next Saturday's primary

For Barack Obama the challenge is stark and clear.  He must remind voters, black, white and Latino, that he is the first African-American candidate for president who runs in what he has tried to fashion as an era of post-identity politics.  The Clinton's are doing their even best to get him off that pedestal and define him both as an overreaching and overly ambitious political prodigy whose time as not yet come.

It's a confrontation that is dangerous for Democratic Party and rife with the potential of sowing defeat into the threads of either candidate's victory in this compressed and super heated primary season.  There are reports now that both Senator Edward Kennedy and Chicago congressman Rahm Emanuel have warned Bill Clinton that he's playing a dangerous game here.  But the former president seems determined to take Obama on himself....and in doing so his legacy as "the first black president" is one the line.

All of this also raises disturbing questions about exactly what his role would be in a Hillary Clinton White House.  Whatever it suggests right now, there is no suggestion he would confine himself to a passive aggressive role.  And it may renew in some voters an unease about what increasingly appears to be the "dynastic" nature of American presidential politics.  Two families, the Bushes and the Clintons, both darlings of their respective political establisments, using their previous time in the White House as a justification to spend more time there.

Obama's campaign is built on the premise that, no matter how tempting, he will not resort to the politics of division.  But he's being double teamed on every pass pattern by two experienced defensive backs who are not above a hold or even grabbing the face mask.  This week will indicate whether there's any play in the Obama playbook to combat that.  Because, after a second place finishh in New Hampshire and Nevada, he's got to put another win on the board before Super Tuesday.  If the Clinton's manage to beat him in South Carolina they will play it as an "upset", manage the expectations game to their advantage and marginalize Obama with more than twenty states voting less than two week later.

It's Obama's challenge now to make sure voters stay in the process and avoid the perception that they are witnessing a "defining moment" in South Carolina.  The media will play a Clinton victory that way and the baby boomers and many others will be quick to accept that rather than deal with the larger questions this fascinating Democratic race has raised. Stay tuned, it may not be all over on February 5th.            

10 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 10
Page 1 of 1
freeramosandcompean read my blog
Jan 21, 2008 | 10:59 PM

huh?
the snake oil salesman?
No substance, pro illegal alien, but what's a rezko situation to chicago politics on a national stage?

FREEDOMFREE read my blog view my photos
Jan 25, 2008 | 7:25 AM

IM VOTING FREE , FOR FREEDOMFREE

tisa2 read my blog
Feb 4, 2008 | 8:40 AM

NO CHILD SUPPORT NO VOTE !

basil64
Feb 4, 2008 | 9:33 AM

It seems to be the Obama/ Oprah ticket. Where is O'Bama's substance? What does he really stand for?

FREEDOMFREE read my blog view my photos
Feb 4, 2008 | 5:54 PM

I STAND FOR , NEW FREEDOM FREE

valentinemartin read my blog
Feb 7, 2008 | 11:04 PM

Former President Bill Clinton is not now or ever was "the first black president." Toni Morrison has fessed up to making a mistake when giving him that nickname, she is voting for Sen Obama. Reasons to not put the Clintons in the White House again are 1.Many in the black community forgot the unprovoked attack then President Bill Clinton made on sista Soldier, no one could believe the PRESIDENT OF THE US would stoop so low as to attack a community activist for pro-black statements (pro-black is not anti white)who was also being attacked by members of the KKK led by Dave King and Jim Kennedy. 2. The racist legislation he signed off on giving blacks a disproporiate sentencing for the same crimes committed by whites, with whites getting more lenient charges of misdemeanors, while criminal acts committed by blacks are almost always felonies, resulting in more felons in the black community. This means no college education, no right to join the military and its benefits, in some instances - the loss of the right to vote which our forefathers fought so valiantly to obtain, and the list continues. 3. Then President Bill Clinton's refusal to apologize for slavery. The latest chapter in this soap opera which should be named "As the stomach Turns" is 1.both of the Clintons belief that Rev Dr Martin Luther King was not responsible for the Civil Rights movement, "it took a President to enact the Civil Rights Movement, Anti-Lynching legislation was only recently enacted after many administrations tried and failed. clearly it takes more than a President to enact any legislation if many do n

mrcrab read my blog
Feb 29, 2008 | 9:17 AM

For Barack Obama. He must remind voters, black, white and Latino, that he is the first Halfbreed-American candidate for president.

I wonder with a name like this, does he have ties with the terrorist groups?

Personaly I think he does!

Vote Obama if you want a repeat of 9/11

liftstation read my blog
Mar 4, 2008 | 10:34 PM

Mr Valentine, We can all be victims if we choose to be. I see nothing in your ststements about, "together". I am white, I like Obama much better than Clinton. But not for the reasons you make. And it's obvious that many many more white people like Obama as well, or he would not be where he is today. And that kind of makes my point to you. But one of the reasons I like him is because he is not talking like you are talking. He is talking about OUR problems and OUR solutions. But also just for the record, President Johnson did more for civil rights than any president going back to Lincoln. And more than any president since. You are correct that Rev. Martin Luther did more to advance the cause than any one man ever. As for an apology for slavery. Many thousnds of good men died to right a wrong many many years ago. And we all understand and regret that the wrongs did not end there. However, if I give you an apology it is for something I personally did to you personally that was wrong. For you to expect or demand an apology from anyone today for slavery is wrong. It means you choose to dwell in the past with little desire to move ahead AND accept the first apology. You want an apology again tomorrow, and the day after that. Now your grinding your heel or looking for an excuse to be mad or be what you are. A great man once said, " Love is the only force capable of transforming an enemy to a friend." That man was Rev. Martin Luther King. I say to you sir, TOGETHER we must become the change we want to see in this world.

ReverendCirca53 read my blog view my photos
Mar 23, 2008 | 2:57 PM

SEE...The New Republic...click the MLK Jr. article, on the right get your Nobama expose'...Anybody seen the New minister Otis Moss??.....

sweetguy45 read my blog
Jul 28, 2008 | 6:26 AM

Personally, I don't think Obama,Clinton or McCain has any substance. I'm voting for a third party candidate, The Constitution party candidate,Chuck Baldwin. I realize that the Republicans and the Democrats have gotten the political arena pretty much sewn up, and don't want any other party represented, but in reality it is not up to the party either Republicans or the Democrats.It is up to the people to take back their country. The Constitution party follows the Constitution unlike the Republicans or the Democrats, and will restore the rights that the Republicans and Democrats in office now have been trying to destroy for many years now. If the people want their country back, than get away from the normal party lines and vote for the Constitution party.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




jackconaty

i'm jack conaty...the political editor at fox news chicago.

Member Since: 9/18/2006