The chorus of people who say Hillary Clinton should withdraw from the race left Anonymous wondering, what are they thinking and what exactly do they have against Democracy?
Democracy in Action
by Anonymous
Apparently some people are not ready to swallow whole the offerings from Barack Obama's public relations machine, which is masquerading as the national press corp. Reporters, editors and news photographers have created an image of an unbeatable, infallible, anointed man who has a birth right to the Democratic nomination. The warm, fuzzy coverage they've provided for the junior Senator from Illinois seems designed to quash the competition and enable Senator Obama to float effortlessly to Inauguration Day and the Presidency.
Democracy demands something different. It offers anyone who has the desire and the means a shot at political leadership. The push and pull of ideas is a benefit to the nation and gives voters a chance to see beyond the glossy, carefully worded hype that's become infused into the American political process.
No one is entitled to be United States President. The person who becomes Chief Executive has to win the job. The political strategists and editorial writers who fume and demand that the opposition cave so a 'favorite son' can have an easy go if it, are behaving in an irresponsible manner. Hillary Clinton has the right to battle to the finish and use every penny of her money to stay in the race, if that's what she chooses to do.
Sure, Americans have the right to elect whoever they wish, but apparently Barack Obama's minions believe that right does not involve fair competition. Try selling that notion to working class people. You know the ones, the people who Senator Obama says, get bitter, cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them. Those Americans generally believe in a fair fight to the finish, but not the people in the Obama camp.
Talk about the height of arrogance, but that's Barack Obama for you and that vibe runs through his campaign, accented by the notion that somehow Hillary Clinton owes it to the party and the nation to drop out of the race. Why, when the the anointed one took soaking in West Virginia and is entirely capable of saying something else so offensive that he alienates another block of voters?
Barack Obama would do better if he would simply accept the inordinately favorable media coverage he receives and remain silent on matters of importance. That way he can avoid any more enormous gaffs, but that's not his style. He speaks then, splat -- another dozy and when it happens, Hillary Clinton will be right there to point out the obvious: Barack Obama is not qualified to be President.
This is the man to whom Senator Clinton should yield, who's going to unite the nation, heal divisions and bring about a new era of politics? Barack Obama has not yet mastered the art of closing his mouth and keeping his outrageous opinions to himself. That would make it easier to suck up all the gushing and adoration he gets from the throngs of reporters who've filed a seemingly unending stream of glowing stories, that tout him as a phenomenon and borderline messiah.
The beauty of all this is, Senator Obama has no one to blame but himself for the consequences of his words, which include the distinct possibility that he will never deliver the political knock-out punch to Hillary Clinton, who could still win the nomination. And just when it appeared that that whole flap about his spiritual advisor was starting to fade.
Poor Barack Obama. No soft, easy ride to the White House for him, not as long as Hillary Clinton and Senator McCain are around. Some voters have started to acknowledge that his vague, rambling answers are usually void of substance. Imagine if he had to face what every single candidate should encounter, tough scrutiny, the kind that Hillary Clinton has faced since she announced that she wanted to be President.
No one on the Obama team wants that. His people want to shove aside Senator Clinton. Democracy -- who cares? They've got a President to appoint and do not care if, in the process, that means damage to the Democratic way of life.
| Member Comments | Total Comments: 21 |
|
|
drerunner
May 19, 2008 | 12:06 PM |
|||||||||
|
drerunner
May 19, 2008 | 12:07 PM |
|||||||||
|
devildog67
May 19, 2008 | 6:21 PM |
|||||||||
|
JimAllen
May 19, 2008 | 9:46 PM |
|||||||||
|
drerunner
May 20, 2008 | 1:23 AM |
|||||||||
|
drerunner
May 20, 2008 | 1:24 AM |
|||||||||
|
JimAllen
May 20, 2008 | 9:38 AM |
|||||||||
|
JimAllen
May 20, 2008 | 9:58 AM |
|||||||||
|
drerunner
May 20, 2008 | 12:56 PM |
|||||||||
|
drerunner
May 20, 2008 | 12:56 PM |
|||||||||
|
drerunner
May 20, 2008 | 12:57 PM |
|||||||||
|
drerunner
May 20, 2008 | 12:58 PM |
|||||||||
|
drerunner
May 20, 2008 | 12:59 PM |
|||||||||
|
drerunner
May 21, 2008 | 9:10 PM |
|||||||||
|
Proud2bBlack
May 24, 2008 | 2:09 PM |
|||||||||
|
Proud2bBlack
May 24, 2008 | 2:10 PM |
|||||||||
|
drerunner
May 24, 2008 | 9:48 PM |
|||||||||
|
JimAllen
May 25, 2008 | 12:34 PM |
|||||||||
|
drerunner
May 25, 2008 | 4:36 PM |
|||||||||
|
JimAllen
May 25, 2008 | 8:21 PM |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
Byron Harlan is a veteran of radio, local and network news. He has a B.A. in Political Science, an M.A. in Journalism and an M.B.A. Byron is from San Diego, plays electric and upright bass as well as mandolin and some guitar (very little) in a Chicago band. He's run eight marathons, two ultra-marathons and has his sights set on triathalons. He's married to Judi Harlan, who is a real estate agent and one heck of a looker.
Member Since: 9/7/2006