MyFox
 

SaxInTheCity's Blog

by SaxInTheCity from Chicago

Last Post 1 day, 11 hours Ago


I had never heard the term "maternal profiling" until a short time ago when I came across an article about it. The more I read, the more I thought to myself, "Wow, I bet that DOES happen more than most people--most women especially, even realize."

Maternal profiling essentially refers to a woman--a MOM--being denied a job or a promotion based solely or mainly on the fact that her potential employer or boss thinks she won't be able to (or be unwilling to) commit fully to the job because of her other responsibilities as a mother (or expectant mother, or future mother, whatever the case might be.) As you'll learn in the story below (aired 9/2/08), it's hard to prove one has been discriminated against for this reason EVEN if the employer comes right out and tells a woman that's why she didn't get the job. Turns out that even though there are local, county and state ordinances in place throughout Illinois that prevent this type of profiling, it's still not technially illegal to utter the words to a job applicant in an interview; "Do you have kids?"

Now, I can actually see (OK, don't stone me, moms) how an employer might WANT to maternally profile. I mean, he or she might say to themselves, "Gosh, with three little ones at home, how ever will Ms. Jones be able to give 100 and 10 percent to the extreme demands of widget making here at WIdget Inc.?! She will surely be calling in sick herself whenever one of her kids is ill, be unable to work late or on weekends when needed, refuse to bring extra work home, and will undoubtedly have her mind elsewhere if one of the tykes is being bullied at school, has lost a tooth or swallowed a marble! I think I'm going to go with Miss Smith instead. She's got no kids at home and seems much more  career-driven. Or better yet, how about MR. Johnson! He's a father but we all know moms do most of the child caretaking any way. HE won't be missing work for any of that kiddie stuff...")

Ok, so it's sexist. I'm not saying I personally think that way. (Trust me, I DON'T.) I just think some employers might try to get away with it--and do! As the son of a working single mom, I saw first-hand how she was able to multi-task on a daily basis. Frankly, I don't know HOW she did it! The moms profiled in this story assure us that they can do it all, as well.

2 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 2
Page 1 of 1
blicket
Sep 5, 2008 | 5:22 PM

All we ever hear about is the JOY of motherhood, but after you become a mother--all these and many more injustices come to light.

Thank you !Mark! for doing this story. The statistics alone can redeem my post-pregnancy employment gap in the eyes of the inlaws. Today is a different day than when they were comin' up.

Cheers,
-MiMi

Volunteer3 read my blog view my photos
Sep 8, 2008 | 9:36 AM

Mark
A veiw point from Latte Liberal Vermont. Strangely enough, this attitude is of concern to these folks. They spend an inordinate amount of time hand wringing over things like this.
Appropriately, they have several NGOs, committees and surveys on going to deal with it.
Also, the employers are encouraged to discuss the details of how the Mom would actually work on the job. Encouraged to mess with the process, in other words.
Not sure about Chicago, but here on the Big Muddy, we allow for having kids. Seems like the best way is to bring them to the work place unless it is a factory. Actually, this is done, and in some places encouraged.
We have to have balance. Families will always be a factor. Moms need to be up front, employers need to be up front. Deal with it, dont hide it, Family's First.
end

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




SaxInTheCity

I'm Mark Saxenmeyer, FOX News Chicago's Special Projects Reporter. If you've got a story idea, please call me at 312-565-5521 or e-mail me at mark.saxenmeyer@foxchicag
o.com. I promise to get back to each and every one of you, even if we can't actually pursue your lead!

Member Since: 10/2/2006